Optimize images Properly formatting and compressing images can save many bytes of data. To reduce their size by 4.5MiB (78% reduction). Compressing could save 783KiB (96% reduction). Compressing and resizing could save 743.9KiB (99% reduction). Compressing could save 417.9KiB (75% reduction). Compressing could save 402.8KiB (74% reduction).
Didier-jeunesse.com has registered 1 decade 3 months ago. This website has a #1,037,922 rank in global traffic. It has a.com as an domain extension. This domain is estimated value of $ 720.00 and has a daily earning of $ 3.00.
Compressing and resizing could save 329.5KiB (99% reduction). Compressing could save 321.4KiB (.% reduction). Compressing could save 126.2KiB (76% reduction). Compressing could save 87.7KiB (68% reduction). Compressing could save 75.6KiB (52% reduction). Compressing could save 67.2KiB (72% reduction). Compressing could save 66.4KiB (70% reduction).
Compressing could save 65.4KiB (73% reduction). Compressing could save 64.9KiB (73% reduction). Compressing could save 64.1KiB (70% reduction). Compressing could save 59.9KiB (.% reduction). Compressing and resizing could save 58.6KiB (96% reduction). Compressing could save 58KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing could save 52KiB (71% reduction). Compressing could save 52KiB (70% reduction). Compressing could save 49.1KiB (72% reduction). Compressing could save 49KiB (73% reduction). Compressing could save 46.8KiB (77% reduction). Compressing could save 45.9KiB (.% reduction).
![Didier Jeunesse Edition Didier Jeunesse Edition](/uploads/1/2/5/4/125488097/874594439.jpg)
Compressing could save 45.2KiB (74% reduction). Compressing could save 45.2KiB (73% reduction). Compressing could save 44.4KiB (.% reduction). Compressing could save 44KiB (71% reduction). Compressing could save 40.4KiB (67% reduction). Compressing could save 40.3KiB (73% reduction). Compressing could save 40.1KiB (68% reduction).
Compressing could save 36.3KiB (75% reduction). Compressing could save 34.4KiB (68% reduction). Compressing could save 33.9KiB (75% reduction).
Compressing could save 29.2KiB (72% reduction). Compressing could save 28.8KiB (37% reduction). Compressing could save 24.2KiB (23% reduction). Compressing could save 4.2KiB (23% reduction). Compressing could save 2.9KiB (23% reduction).
Compressing could save 1.4KiB (46% reduction). Compressing could save 1.4KiB (17% reduction).
Compressing could save 1.4KiB (49% reduction). Compressing could save 1.3KiB (45% reduction). Compressing could save 1.1KiB (50% reduction). Compressing could save 1.1KiB (59% reduction). Compressing could save 1.1KiB (59% reduction).
Compressing could save 1.1KiB (16% reduction). Compressing could save 1.1KiB (59% reduction). Compressing could save 1.1KiB (57% reduction). Compressing could save 1.1KiB (51% reduction). Compressing could save 1.1KiB (58% reduction). Compressing could save 1.1KiB (67% reduction).
Compressing could save 1KiB (27% reduction). Compressing could save 1KiB (36% reduction).
Compressing could save 1KiB (90% reduction). Compressing could save 1,022B (41% reduction). Compressing could save 993B (68% reduction).
Compressing could save 985B (76% reduction). Compressing could save 985B (40% reduction). Compressing could save 976B (77% reduction). Compressing could save 958B (41% reduction). Compressing could save 957B (60% reduction). Compressing could save 953B (59% reduction). Compressing could save 953B (31% reduction).
Compressing could save 947B (54% reduction). Compressing could save 940B (49% reduction). Compressing could save 937B (27% reduction). Compressing could save 937B (27% reduction).
Compressing could save 918B (66% reduction). Compressing could save 918B (27% reduction). Compressing could save 918B (27% reduction). Compressing could save 916B (62% reduction). Compressing could save 906B (48% reduction). Compressing could save 876B (50% reduction).
Compressing could save 865B (72% reduction). Compressing could save 862B (90% reduction). Compressing could save 860B (90% reduction). Compressing could save 859B (90% reduction). Compressing could save 857B (91% reduction).
Compressing could save 854B (92% reduction). Compressing could save 854B (92% reduction). Compressing could save 838B (74% reduction).
Compressing could save 829B (34% reduction). Compressing could save 820B (27% reduction). Compressing could save 753B (19% reduction). Compressing could save 742B (19% reduction). Compressing could save 706B (18% reduction). Compressing could save 598B (34% reduction). Compressing could save 581B (29% reduction).
Leverage browser caching Setting an expiry date or a maximum age in the HTTP headers for static resources instructs the browser to load previously downloaded resources from local disk rather than over the network. Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content Your page has 12 blocking script resources and 10 blocking CSS resources.
This causes a delay in rendering your page. None of the above-the-fold content on your page could be rendered without waiting for the following resources to load. Try to defer or asynchronously load blocking resources, or inline the critical portions of those resources directly in the HTML.: of the following: http://www.didier-jeunesse.com/wp-content/themes/didier-jeunesse/css/global.css?v=2. Enable compression Compressing resources with gzip or deflate can reduce the number of bytes sent over the network. For the following resources to reduce their transfer size by 322.3KiB (79% reduction). Compressing could save 77.9KiB (81% reduction).
Compressing could save 57.2KiB (81% reduction). Compressing could save 38.1KiB (80% reduction). Compressing could save 36KiB (75% reduction). Compressing could save 28.5KiB (80% reduction). Compressing could save 27KiB (91% reduction). Compressing could save 10.3KiB (77% reduction).
Compressing could save 9.8KiB (64% reduction). Compressing could save 7KiB (72% reduction). Compressing could save 6.8KiB (81% reduction). Compressing could save 6.3KiB (72% reduction).
Compressing could save 4.7KiB (75% reduction). Compressing could save 3.2KiB (.% reduction). Compressing could save 2.4KiB (71% reduction).
Compressing could save 1.8KiB (57% reduction). Compressing could save 1.3KiB (63% reduction). Compressing could save 1.2KiB (57% reduction). Compressing could save 1.2KiB (65% reduction). Compressing could save 982B (79% reduction).
Compressing could save 512B (45% reduction). Minify JavaScript Compacting JavaScript code can save many bytes of data and speed up downloading, parsing, and. time. For the following resources to reduce their size by 97KiB (61% reduction).
Minifying could save 67.1KiB (70% reduction). Minifying could save 19.1KiB (53% reduction). Minifying could save 4.2KiB (44% reduction). Minifying could save 2.3KiB (50% reduction). Minifying could save 1.8KiB (29% reduction).
Minifying could save 1.4KiB (45% reduction). Minifying could save 1.1KiB (51% reduction). Minify CSS Compacting CSS code can save many bytes of data and speed up download and p.
times. For the following resources to reduce their size by 12.7KiB (14% reduction). Minifying could save 7.1KiB (11% reduction). Minifying could save 4KiB (31% reduction). Minifying could save 1.5KiB (19% reduction). HTTP/1.0 200 OK Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 17:46:07 GMT Server: Apache X-Powered-By: PHP/5.3.22 Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=2iq4qebjs8k1ia8khjnqb2kcr1; path=/ Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0 Pragma: no-cache X-Pingback: Access-Control-Allow-Origin:.
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: origin, x-requested-with, content-type Access-Control-Allow-Methods: PUT, GET, POST, DELETE, OPTIONS Connection: close Content-Type: text/html; ch.t=UTF-8. Whois lookup at whois.gandi.net.